Swainson's Hawk Visits New Brunswick

                                Swainson's Hawk Adult Dark Morph  [Photo by Rhonda Langelaan]

On Monday, June 30, 2025, an unusual hawk was seen by two seasoned New Brunswick birders.  It was perched in a tree near their home at Second North River, NB (near Salisbury).  It was on the edge of a newly-cut hay field where it had been feeding.  Recognizing it as unusual they checked it more thoroughly including photographing it.  An expert confirmed their identification, an adult dark morph Swainson’s Hawk!  Other common names for this species are Grasshopper Hawk, Locust Hawk and Harrier Hawk.

The Swainson’s Hawk (Buteo swainsoni) is a western North American species and is very rare here in the east.  There have been only a few previous records in NB and they were not well documented with photographs.  Most that have been seen here have been immatures. There was a juvenile reported from Waterside on 10 October 2002.  I saw the immature found at Shepody Marsh near Hopewell Hill on 5 December, 2011.  

In summer this truly western species is fairly common and easily seen in grassland habitats and agricultural areas of the Great Plains westward but not on the Pacific coastal plain.  It occurs east to NW Illinois and northward to central Alaska and the Northwest Territories (rarely).  It breeds southward through the western US states to north central Mexico.   

Migration in this species can be thought of as a mass exodus to and from Argentina.  This species is the second longest migrant of any North American raptor.  The Arctic nesting Peregrine Falcons fly farther.  The migration flight of the Swainson’s Hawk from breeding grounds to the pampas in Brazil or Argentina can reach 11,400 km, taking as long as 2 months.  During migration they gain altitude by soaring in circles on a rising thermal.  They then set their wings and glide for long distances.  They slowly lose altitude and repeat the process when they meet another thermal.  This gives the effect of the birds being strung out in groups across the sky.  

As the migrating birds make their way to South America they all pass over the Isthmus of Panama.  Concentrations over sites such as Panama City, Balboa and Ancon Hill are spectacular.  Here they cluster in ‘great towering tornadoes of birds’.  This would be a birders dream to see.  A similar effect occurs over a narrow corridor in the Andes Mountains.

So, what is an adult Swainson’s Hawk doing in New Brunswick in summer or anytime?  Well, the entire population is migratory.  Most birds move to southern South America (Argentina) in winter.  The counts of migrants over Veracruz, Mexico average over half a million!  A number winter in southern Florida, S California and S Texas.  Swainson’s Hawks are rare but regular fall and spring visitors to eastern North America.  The records show many sight, specimen and banding records from all states and provinces.  Being on the edge of the east, one can understand why we see so few.  Why this bird is a wandering adult we cannot explain.  As one of our birders said, it should be in our prairie provinces looking after its nest or fledglings.

                                    Swainson's Hawk Adult Dark Morph  [Photo by Nelson Poirier]

The home territory of a Swainson’s Hawks is about 6.5 km².  It prefers open prairie and dry grasslands.  Nests are made of twigs and are placed in trees, shrubs, on the edge of a cliff or even on a utility pole.  Two to four white to light blue-green eggs marked with light brown are laid.  The female incubates the eggs for about 34-35 days and the male brings her food while she is sitting. 

The diet of this hawk is mainly grasshoppers and locusts but also small mammals and rodents.  This accounts for its common name, ‘Grasshopper Hawk’.  Undoubtedly our visitor was enjoying the grasshoppers in that newly mown field!

The Swainson’s Hawk is a large Buteo.  It resembles the shape of other members of its genus; the Red-tailed, the Red-shouldered, the Broad-winged, and the Rough-legged Hawks (along with others not common here).  It is 53 cm. long with a wingspan of 132 cm.  Compared to the Red-tailed Hawk, it has a shorter body length but longer, narrower wings.  The long wings of the Swainson’s Hawk reach or slightly exceed the tail tip on perched adults.  This is a good field mark.

The plumages of this species can be described by three morphs or types.  These are not definitive, because individuals can vary in a continuum from light to dark and all stages in between.  The photos shown above are of the individual which was seen in New Brunswick this past week.  That individual is an adult dark morph. 

The various plumages of this species are varied and interesting.  Let’s look at them here.  Our visitor is a lighter version of a DARK MORPH.  Dark morphs are rare and comprise only 1 to 10 percent of the population.  In some geographical areas they can vary up to 35 % of the local population; e.g., northern California. 

In the DARK MORPH the body and upperwing and uppertail coverts are overall dark brown.  Most have pale, barred with dark brown undertail coverts.  Underwing coverts are dark brown and rufous but can be completely dark brown. 

Our visitor appears to have dark brown upper wing coverts and this probably extends over its back and head.  The undertail does appear pale and barred with dark brown.  The underwing coverts cannot be seen but the light colour showing on the forward edge of the wing suggests there is some light colour on the wing linings.  The white face on this bird is typical of the species.  

Some other species of buteos have dark morphs (Red-tailed, Rough-legged) so if this bird were completely dark, how could we tell it from these other species?  All other dark morphs of other species have dark undertail coverts and silvery flight feathers. 

The LIGHT MORPH is the most common plumage.  It also has the white face.  Its rufous to dark brown breast looks like a bib that contrasts with the light belly.  This white belly can be spotted or barred.  The underwing is two-toned, with creamy or white coverts over gray flight feathers.  The head and underparts are of 3 possible types: 1. head rufous or dark with a gray face, rufous breast, white belly and leg feathers which can be lightly marked with rufous.  2. head dark brown, breast rufous, belly white with dark spotting, leg feathers white.  3. head and breast dark brown.  All types have a white forehead and throat. 

                            Swainson's Hawk Adult Light Morph  [Internet Photo]

The RUFOUS MORPH is similar to the light morph but with rufous belly and leg feathers.  Males have a gray face and completely rufous underparts.  They lack the contrasting darker bib and dark barring.  Females have dark brown faces, breasts and dark markings on their rufous bellies  The underwing of the rufous morph is  two-toned with rufous and creamy coverts over dark flight feathers. Their white undertail coverts contrast with their rufous belly.

                                Swainson's Hawk Rufous Morph  [Internet Photo]

Besides these plumages also described are light and dark intermediate plumages.  This is obviously an attempt to describe or categorize the continuum in plumages from very light to very dark.  The JUVENILE plumages are also variable and best learned by looking at the literature.  By late spring some juveniles show sun bleaching on their head feathers, appearing white.  Year-old birds are similar to juveniles but have wide subterminal tail bands.  

In all plumages one notable feature is the dark trailing edge of the underwing.  This distinguishes this species from all but a few other hawks.  Here in NB the Osprey and the Northern Harrier would be in that group.  

Swainson's Hawk Juvenile Showing Whitish Head, Mottled Plumage and Dark Trailing Edge to Underwing  [Internet Photo]

The flight of Swainson’s Hawks is notable.  Their wings are long and slim and two-toned underneath.  Their tails look long and the bibs on light morphs are visible.  Wing positions are also notable.  They often fly with the wings in a dihedral position and they will hover over feeding areas in search of food.

What other species do we need to differentiate this species from?  Here in NB we could usually rule out Swainson’s Hawk because it is so rare.  But now that we have better optics and cameras we have better observation skills than our predecessors.  In the west it has to be differentiated from the Short-tailed Hawk and the White-tailed Hawk.  We won’t concern ourselves with those species here since they are extremely rare.  Here we do have to consider the Red-tailed Hawk.  The Red-tailed has shorter, wider wings which it does not hold in a dihedral position.  It also has the palatial marks on the leading edge of the underwings and the wings are evenly coloured underneath.  You might also be able to see the dark belly band of the Red-tailed.  When perched the Swainson’s wing feathers extend beyond the tail tip.  This does not occur in the Red-tailed.  

The Swainson’s Hawk was first described by Charles Bonaparte in 1838.  It was named after William Swainson, a British naturalist.  Swainson’s Hawks often live to be 20 years old.  The oldest record is 26 years. Causes of death include vehicular collisions, illegal shooting, electrocution, and severe weather.   Egg infertility is also a problem in some areas.  Overall population decline is attributed to pesticide use on the wintering grounds.  Over the breeding range the population is stable.  However, in some places especially in its far western breeding grounds it has drastically declined (Oregon, California).  Habitat loss is probably a big factor there.  

Swainson’s Hawks have interesting forms of feeding.  They often soar over a field looking for grasshoppers, dragonflies and other insects.  They will show the dihedral wing position or sometimes hover while doing this.  They sometimes course low over a field like a Northern Harrier.  They will still hunt from a perch and watch for insects which they fly out and grab with their foot and then transfer it to their mouth while flying.  They will sit on the ground or walk around and wait for prey.  They are attracted to haying, mowing and ploughing so our western farmers must be very familiar with this species.  Besides insects they also hunt small mammals and reptiles.  They eat a lot of gophers, ground-squirrels and free-tailed bats. 

The call of the Swainson’s Hawk is a high thin scream that falls off at the end.  It sounds like a weak Red-tailed Hawk’s call.

It is always interesting to find a rare species in NB.  It gives a learning opportunity and widens our knowledge of birds and their life histories.  Why is this new visitor an adult when all previous records have been of juveniles?  We don’t know the answer but all migrating individuals are subject to getting blown off course or misinterpreting their internal navigations.  Some do make mistakes.  Perhaps that is what happened in this case.  Hopefully it will stay around NB until fall migration and it will then go south to meet the huge numbers of its species as they wend their way to cross over to South America. 

An Unusual Cause of Death in a Sora

 Notice:  This article contains photos of a pathological avian specimen

                                                            Sora  [B. Schneider Photo]

On 19 May 2025 I was  birding Wilkins Field in Fredericton North.  After seeing such interesting birds as a Great Egret and a singing Willow Flycatcher I met one of the birders who frequents that birding spot.  In the course of our chat he offered that he had seen a dead Sora down the trail and it ‘had its guts hanging out’.  Being a former veterinary pathologist, of course I was interested.  

                            Deceased Sora Found on Trail at Wilkins Field  [B. Schneider Photo]

The body of the Sora was in good condition, having died only recently.  It was immediately obvious that this bird was not killed by a predator or accidentally run over by a motor vehicle.  A few vehicles and 4-wheelers do go through there and the normally locked gate at the entrance was open.  On observation the cause of death was obvious - egg binding.  

                        Body of Sora Showing Prolapsed Tissue   [B. Schneider Photo]

What is egg binding?  Egg binding occurs in avian species when for various reasons the bird is unable to pass the egg.  It is seen periodically in poultry and caged birds.  I have never seen or heard of it in wild birds and reports are rare.  In order to understand it, I must  start with a brief description of the process of egg production.

In egg production the mature ovum (undeveloped egg) moves from the ovary into the oviduct.  As it moves down the oviduct it becomes fertilized by the male sperm and then more developed, gaining size and developing its albumen and shell.  When formed it passes from the oviduct into the cloaca.  From there the female lays the egg into the nest.  The cloaca is a cavity in the posterior of the avian species into which the urinary, digestive and reproductive tracts open.  

In egg-binding the egg lodges in the oviduct and the bird cannot pass it into the cloaca.  This situation becomes critical and causes great stress to the bird often leading to death.  Occasionally treatment with warm baths, massaging and changes in diet can help in domestic birds but this is not possible in wild birds.  

What causes egg-binding?  Sometimes there appears to be no obvious cause at all. We often can, however, predict the cause from our experience with caged birds and poultry.  One important cause is cold, damp conditions during the laying season.  We certainly had that in May here in New Brunswick, having had a lot of rain and cold weather.  This would lead to poor nutrition and it could affect the functioning of the oviducts.  This could result in spasms and cramping of the muscles in the oviduct.  This could result in slow movement of the egg down the oviduct or even stasis.  This could then result in excessive amounts of albumen being laid down or extra layers of shell being applied.  This could produce an extra large egg which would be difficult to pass.  The spasms of the muscles could cause the egg to fail to move down and into the cloaca.  Spasms could also cause extra mucus to be produced which can lead to total obstruction.  The production of further ova above the obstruction can lead to further impaction.   Another cause is atony or paralysis of the oviduct which results in a normal, fully developed egg being arrested in its movement down the oviduct and into the cloaca.  The insufficient muscular activity would result in stasis and egg binding.  Stasis of the egg in the oviduct leads to excessive straining by the bird to eject the egg.  With no movement of the egg this can lead to prolapse of the oviduct into the abdomen or prolapse of the cloaca into the exterior.  

Dietary deficiencies can also be a cause.  One would assume that a wild bird would be able to find an adequate diet in a place in which it has previously nested and which has not been altered by humankind, which is the case at Wilkins Field.  The body condition of the bird was normal so it was not starving.

The Sora in this case had egg binding and prolapse of the oviduct and cloaca to the exterior.  This bird obviously had been in distress for one to two days.  It unfortunately had suffered greatly during that time.  If it had been found before its death it would have been unlikely we could have saved it through surgery.  I extracted the egg from the prolapsed tissue and it was a normal size (30.1 mm) and colour.  Its shell was very soft and its shape was normal.  See photos below.

                                    Deceased Sora After Egg Removal  [B. Schneider Photo]

This unfortunate female Sora died of egg binding which led to prolapse of the oviduct and cloaca and subsequent death from stress and dehydration.  It probably had a nest in which there were other eggs which then would have been predated.  The Sora is present in a few numbers at Wilkins field but the surviving male may not have been able to find another female with which to carry on breeding.  

                        Deceased Sora Showing Egg and Prolapsed Tissue    [B. Schneider Photo]

This is an unusual event in the breeding history of the Sora but we are fortunate it is rare and probably does not significantly affect the overall population numbers.  An interesting case, but an unfortunate loss of a female Sora.

The Dowitchers - How to Tell Them Apart

                                Long-billed Dowitcher - Note: dark tail, no primary extension

The Dowitchers, how do we tell them apart?  This is a recurring dilemma for birders.  Both species occur here and they often get listed as ‘Dowitchers’ because they are not easy to tell apart.  This post is an attempt to make differentiating them a little easier.

The Short-billed (SBD) and the Long-billed Dowitchers (LBD) have very similar breeding and non-breeding plumages.  Both are of a similar size - SBDs are 28 cm long and LBDs are 29 cm.  They are part of the family, Scolopacidae.  They are medium-sized, stocky, long-billed shorebirds. They feed in muddy shallow water probing for aquatic insects and invertebrates in a rapid up-an-down sewing-machine-like fashion.  In flight they show a white wedge running from the middle of the back down to the barred grayish tail.  They usually feed and rest in flocks on tidal marshes, mudflats and bogs. 

                        Short-billed Dowitcher - Note: weak supercilium, primary extension

The SBD species is made up of three subspecies; Atlantic, Prairie, and Pacific.  Subspecies are not described for the LBD.  The Atlantic subspecies of the SBD is the one we are concerned with here.  It breeds in northern Canada from Labrador westward to the eastern shore of Hudson Bay.  The LBD is a more western species, breeding from northeastern Siberia eastward to the western and northern parts of Alaska and eastward to the Northwest Territories.  The SBD migrates in fall to the southern US and as far south as Brazil.  The LBD migrates in the fall to southern California and sometimes into northern South America.  Some move eastward in their fall migration and that is why we see some here on our coasts in the fall.  In fact, that is one clue in identifying this species.  A dowitcher seen here in late fall can quite likely be a LBD.  It would be very rare in the spring.  

                Short-billed Dowitcher  Note: streamlined body shape, light spotting, light barring

Differentiating these two species is difficult.  It apparently is easy in juveniles (which we don’t often see here), difficult with breeding adults and very difficult in winter plumage adults.  And add to that, the plumage can get worn or the bird may be moulting - which also makes it difficult.  So if you identify it as ‘dowitcher’, don’t feel upset.  You are not alone. Many go as ‘unidentified’ even by experts.

There are many differentiating features in these species.  These can help a lot but are not totally dependable.  They can vary among individuals.  For example, the LBD has a distinctive white supercilium which is more indistinct in the SBD.  However, you can have a flock of LBDs with an individual or two with indistinct supercilia.  The same goes for other traits.

The location in which you find these birds can help.  SBDs prefer coastal marine habitats especially muddy unvegetated mudflats next to shallow bays, lagoons, estuaries, salt marshes and sandy beaches.  LBDs prefer freshwater habitats especially those with short vegetation such as marshes, wet grassy meadows, flooded rice fields, agricultural flats, lakeshores and open mudflats.  

The appearance of the flock as they feed can be diagnostic.  LBDs are longer-legged.  They stand taller than SBDs and can feed in deeper water.  If you see a mixed flock in the same pool, the LBDs will show more space between their bellies and the water surface than the SBDs.  The body shape of the birds also is a good clue.  The SBD is much more streamlined and the LBD is rounder and more heavy-bodied looking.  

                Long-billed Dowitchers  Note: rounded body shape, prominent supercilium, long legs

The bill length, contrary to the names of these species, does not help in identification.  The LBD does have a slightly proportionately longer bill than the SBD.  But the bill lengths of the two species overlap.  In both species the female has a longer bill than the male.   But the bill length of a female SBD can equal the bill length of the male LBD.  The longest proportionate bill length is seen in the female LBD.  Given the above, the bill length is not a trustworthy identifying feature.  The tip of the bill of the dowitchers has tactile receptors enabling them to locate prey by touch while probing deep in the mud.  They feed on insect larvae, crustaceans, polychaetes, molluscs and plant material.

The call of these species is the best way to identify them.  This is not always heard but one must be listening carefully.  You might get only one chance to hear it!  The SBDs utter a soft, mellow ‘tu-tu-tu’ and the SBD flock is quiet while feeding.  The LBDs give a soft chatter while feeding and emit a high-pitched ‘keek’ when disturbed.  Hearing the sounds uttered by these feeding birds may be your only chance to identify them.

We need to look at two other features before we compare plumage.  The body shapes can help us tell them apart.  The SBD is more streamlined.  The LBD is more rounded with a rounded back and appears heavy-bellied.  So, looking at profiles can help.  Primary extension is also a clue, whether the primary wing feathers extend beyond the tail tip.  In the SBD the wing feathers extend beyond the tail.  This is not a long extension but it exists if the plumage is not worn.  It can change depending on the position of the bird.  If it is bent over (probing the mud, e.g.) the wing feathers are pulled a bit forward and the extension may not be as visible.  In the LBD the primary wing feathers do not extend beyond the tail feathers. 

Now let’s discuss plumage, an identifying feature which can help but can also be very difficult.  Complicating factors include feather wear, breeding or non-breeding plumage and moult. In the breeding plumage both species are patterned brown on the back and head with orange down the neck and breast.  In non-breeding plumage both species are grayish with the SBD lighter in colour than the LBD.  In the breeding plumage the SBD has dark speckles and barring on the sides of the neck, breast and flanks.  The LBD in breeding plumage has heavy spots on the sides of the neck and wedge-shaped bars down the flanks.  In non-breeding plumage both species are gray and the SBD is lighter in appearance with fine spotting and a whitish mottled breast.  In non-breeding plumage the LBD is darker in colour because it is more mottled above with a darker breast. The breast is a more uniform gray colour and the bird is less patterned on the back.

Long-billed Dowitchers  [Brian Stone Photo]  Note: non-breeding plumage, darker with mottled breast, white tips to scapular feathers on left bird, white distinct supercilium, dark loral stripe

In both plumages the supercilium is a key feature.  The LBD has a distinct white supercilium (line over the eye) and a dark loral stripe which continues past the eye.  The supercilium is less prominent in the SBD.  The scapular feathers can also be a clue.  In the SBD the pale tips to the scapular feathers connect to thicker pale edges running up the sides of the feathers.  In the LBD the scapulars are darker with well-defined white tips.  Like many other feathers used in identifying these species, these features are not always visible and can be variable.  

The tail feathers can also help.  Formerly I understood that the colour of the tail feathers was a good feature to differentiate the two species.  However,  recent texts don’t give much mention to this feature.  I was always taught that the SBD’s tail was black on white and the LBD tail was white on black, meaning that the SBD tail was mainly white and the LBD tail was mainly black.  The tail of the SBD is whiter due to wider white cross bars compared to the narrower black bars.  The SBD does not show any rufous or orange on its central tail feathers.  The tail of the LBD is darker, mainly black with narrow white or orange lines.  It can have rufous or orange in its central tail feathers.  That information is interesting and can be useful but it is difficult to see the tail of a dowitcher.  See the photo of the LBD below which clearly shows its black tail with orange lines. 

                Long-billed Dowitcher  Note: tail looks black with orange on feathers, bold supercilium

Acknowledging the variability of plumages, etc., in these two species and a careful study of the dowitchers especially with photos one should be able to differentiate many individuals.  Note also that even the experts have some they cannot tell apart.  With one in the hand it should be reasonably easy but we don’t get that chance often.

So, what are the key features to tell dowitchers apart in the field?  The CALL is the key feature.  We have to use our ears as well as our eyes!  Besides that, look at the SHAPE of the bird, the SIZE in comparison with the other dowitchers around it.  If it is in non-breeding plumage, is it darker or lighter?  If it is in breeding plumage, look at the spots and bars on the neck, breast and flanks.  The two species prefer different HABITATS:  the LBD prefers freshwater habitats and breeds in the far northwest; the SBD prefers saltwater habitats and breeds farther east, our Atlantic subspecies in Labrador and Hudson Bay.  The difficulty in separating the two species is exacerbated by the great variability in the SBD species.

Long-billed Dowitcher  [Jim Carroll Photo]  Note: non-breeding plumage, supercilium, dark loral line extending beyond eye, dark plumage with barring on flanks

I will conclude with a few interesting facts about dowitchers.  It has been shown that the SBD and the LBD diverged genetically more than 4 million years ago. For a long time both the SBD and the LBD were considered one species, the Long-billed Dowitcher.  The SBD was not separated from the LBD until 1950.  A nest of a SBD had been found and described in 1906 but nothing was made of it until much later.  The generic name of the species, Limnodromus, is from ancient Greek.  limne means ‘marsh’ and dromos means ‘racer’.  You can see how this fits.  The English name is from the Iroquois language and was first recorded in 1844.  The Long-billed Dowitcher was first described in 1832 by Thomas Say.  

The dowitchers are described as the ‘ideal bird’ for bird watching.  They are common here, are challenging for birders and allow us to approach for good viewing.  The male LBD courts the female by singing to her and then competes with other males by pursuing them in flight, displaying an aerial show of speed and agility.  We are not going to be able to see that in New Brunswick but it gives us something to think about. I can’t quite picture a singing dowitcher.

See the photo below.  What species do you think this is? Why?

Please note:  The dowitcher identifications in this blog post have been done by me and may be inaccurate.

Bird Populations Are Still Declining

 

Wood Duck, A Common Dabbling Duck  [B Schneider Photo]

The recent report from the Cornell Lab states that our bird populations are still declining, that some rare birds are on the verge of extinction and that some of our still-common species are rapidly declining.  These concerning data are ultimately related to human populations and human behaviour.  It is paramount that conservation action be commenced/increased immediately. The data for these revelations have been provided by many bird conservation groups in Canada and the US.  These include our own Christmas Bird Counts, Point Lepreau Sea Watch, Owl Nocturnal Surveys, Shorebird Surveys, etc.

A study in 2019 estimated a net loss of 3 billion birds in North America in the preceding 50 years.  Well, the sad news is that the decline is still happening even with the conservation efforts we have been making.  In 2019 the good news was that the duck populations had increased.  That is no longer the case; duck populations are now declining.

According to the data provided by Cornell Lab, here is the present state of our bird populations since 1970 (in %):

Ducks, dabbling and diving +24%

Waterbirds +16%

Ducks, sea  - 4%

Western forest birds  -11%

Eastern forest birds  - 27%

Shorebirds  - 33%

Aridland birds  - 41%

Grassland birds  - 43%

These data are chilling. We are well past the ‘Oh, well’ stage.  Much more  effective action must be taken. We cannot even pat ourselves on the back when talking about diving and dabbling ducks or waterbirds. The duck population has declined from about +45% in 2019 to +24% since 2019. The first thing we need to do about that is to lobby to stop duck hunting in New Brunswick.  This would only be one measure from many we need to do.  The increase in the last 50 years has been greatly influenced by the work done by Ducks Unlimited.  We need to give them more support and encouragement.

                            Greater Yellowlegs, A Common Shorebird  [Photo by B Schneider]

Look at our forest birds and our shorebirds!  What can we do about that? With forest birds the situation is complex. It is tied to clearcutting, aerial spraying and other forest management practices.  Loss of habitat and pollution of their environment are undoubtedly serious causes.  

                    Northern Parula, A Common Wood Warbler  [Photo by B Schneider]

There is a lot of good scientific work done on how to restore bird populations.  We need to be proactive.  Remaining in a reactive mode just doesn’t work anymore. We need to restore more wetlands, forests and grasslands.   Forest monocultures and cultivated grasslands are not conducive to healthy bird populations. We need to continue to develop forest, wetlands and grasslands that are protected from fire, flood, erosion and drought. 

According to Cornell, there are over 100 million birders in North America and in the US alone, they spend $279 million on their activities annually.  North American birders could have a lot of influence if we used much more of our time and resources on bird conservation and habitat restoration.

Let’s look at the history of bird decline. The largest number of bird species on earth occurred from the Miocene through the Pleistocene periods, about 20 million years ago. Since then the rate of extinction has exceeded the rate of population increase. In early times, before the advent of modern civilization, primitive man lived in harmony with bird populations and there was little population decline. 

With modernization, the extinctions accelerated.  The first species known to be eliminated by man was the Dodo (Raphus cucullatus).  The Dodo lived on the island of Mauritius in the Indian Ocean.  It was first discovered in 1507 by the Portuguese.  Man arrived by ship and slaughtered the birds and along with the rats, cats, pigs, and monkeys which they brought, they succeeded in killing all the Dodos.  Extinction date for that species was 1681. 

A similar event occurred in North America with the Great Auk.  It lived along the coast of North America from about Cape Cod northward and eastward to include Greenland and Iceland. Sailors and fisherman slaughtered the birds for meat and oil, took their eggs and feathers and used them for cod bait. That species was able to endure the onslaught until 1844 when it became extinct.

Other species that have become extinct in our modern times are the Passenger Pigeon, the Carolina Parakeet, the Labrador Duck, and the Heath Hen.  In fact since 1681, with the loss of the Dodo, 78 species and 49 accepted subspecies have become extinct in the world. Man was paramount in the loss of at least half of this number! We can add to that, with the number of species that are on the verge of extinction or have become extinct but are not officially classified as such: Eskimo Curlew, American Ivory-billed Woodpecker, etc.

It is only common sense to think that no species can exist forever and would have a normal life expectancy. Some scientists have calculated that number at 16,000 years. But that would depend on the birds changing environment and how well the species could adapt to new conditions. But the big problem we face is the surging human population and how difficult it is to convince humankind to change their behaviour.  It is often not even possible to halt the changing conditions even if the human population is working towards improvement. One thing is certain, humans need to become aggressive conservationists in our economy, our environmental work and in our future planning. Our world population in 2025 is estimated to be 8.2 billion and is projected to increase to 10 billion by the 2080s. The decline in bird populations will be even greater  in the future unless drastic measures are taken.

References:

Olin Sewall Pettingill, Jr. Ornithology in Laboratory and Field. Burgess Publishing Co. 1970.

Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology. 2025. eNews. New State of the Birds Report is a Clarion Call for Conservation Action.